PRISM RISK SCORING

COMPOSITE RISK INTELLIGENCE ACROSS 8 DIMENSIONS

PRISM evaluates every entity across sanctions, PEP status, jurisdiction risk, debarments, offshore leak appearances, network proximity, shell indicators, and corporate history. Each dimension is weighted, scored, and combined into a single 0–100 composite risk score with full auditability.

OVERVIEW

Not a blacklist check. A risk ontology.

Traditional screening returns a binary match/no-match result. PRISM goes further: it scores every entity across 8 weighted risk dimensions, producing a composite score that reflects the totality of risk — not just whether a name appears on a list.

Each dimension contributes independently. Sanctions presence (+80) carries the most weight, followed by PEP tier (+50), debarments (+35), and jurisdiction risk (+30). Network proximity, shell indicators, offshore leak appearances, and historical sanctions add nuance. The result is a score capped at 100, with full dimension-level breakdown for audit and explainability.

PRISM8 DIMENSIONSSANPEPDEBJURNETSHLICJHIS0-100

PRISM

HOW IT WORKS

SANCTIONS+80PEP+50DEBARMENTS+35JURISDICTION+30NETWORK+30SHELL+20LEAK-DB+20HISTORICAL+15PRISMv1.0SCORE94CRITICAL

[ SIGNAL EXTRACTION ]

Extract risk signals from resolved entity data.

Once IRIS resolves an entity, PRISM scans the unified record for 8 categories of risk signals: active sanctions, PEP designations, debarment records, greylist jurisdictions, offshore leak appearances, network connections to flagged entities, shell company indicators, and historical sanctions with temporal decay.

SDN-ASANCTIONS+80JRSD GREYLISTJURISDICTION+30LEAK-02OFFSHORE+20SHELL INDICATORSTRUCTURE+20COMPOSITE SCORE80 + 30 + 20 + 2094/100CRITICAL75-10050-7425-490-24CRITICAL HIGH MEDIUM LOW

[ WEIGHTED SCORING ]

Each signal receives a calibrated weight.

Sanctions presence contributes up to +80 points. PEP status adds up to +50 (tier-dependent). Debarments: +35. jurisdictional risk: +30. Network proximity and shell indicators are capped at +30 and +20 respectively. Each weight is calibrated against institutional risk frameworks and can be configured per deployment.

TEMPORAL DECAY FUNCTION806040200802024LISTED482025DELISTED292026PRESENT172027PROJECTEDDECAY MODELscore × e^(-λt)

[ TEMPORAL DECAY ]

Historical risk fades, but never disappears.

When an entity is delisted from a sanctions program, the associated risk score doesn't drop to zero. PRISM applies an exponential decay function — the signal weakens over time but remains visible in the composite score. This ensures that previously sanctioned entities still surface elevated risk during screening.

PRISM RISK ASSESSMENTCRITICALENTITYMossack Fonseca & Co.ent_7f3a9c2d · company · PACOMPOSITE SCORE94RISK DIMENSIONSsanctions0/80pep0/50offshore_leaks40/40jurisdiction_risk22/30shell_indicators18/20network_risk14/3042 SOURCES CHECKED · LAST UPDATED 2026-03-22T00:00:00Z · PRISM v1.0

[ STRUCTURED OUTPUT ]

Every score is explainable and auditable.

The PRISM output includes the composite score (0–100), risk tier classification (CRITICAL/HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW), full dimension-level breakdown, contributing signals with source citations, and temporal context. Every number is traceable to its upstream source for regulatory audit.

PRISM ENGINE

CAPABILITIES

P01

8-DIMENSION MODEL

8-DIMENSION MODEL

Sanctions, PEP, jurisdiction, debarments, offshore leaks, network risk, shell indicators, and corporate history. Each scored independently with configurable weights.

P02

COMPOSITE SCORING

COMPOSITE SCORING

Weighted signals combine into a single 0–100 score. Non-linear aggregation prevents any single dimension from dominating without cause.

P03

TEMPORAL DECAY

TEMPORAL DECAY

Historical sanctions and expired PEP designations decay exponentially. Configurable half-life ensures institutional memory without permanent stigma.

P04

WEIGHT CALIBRATION

WEIGHT CALIBRATION

Per-dimension weights are configurable per deployment. Financial institutions, defense contractors, and government agencies can tune scoring to their risk appetite.

PRISM RISK SCORING

SOLUTIONS

PRISM SCORE BREAKDOWNSanctions0/80PEP0/50Offshore Leaks40/40Jurisdiction22/30Shell Indicators18/20Network Risk14/30Debarments0/35Historical0/15COMPOSITE94/100

[ SCORE COMPOSITION ]

Full visibility into what drives every risk score.

Every PRISM score comes with a complete dimension-level breakdown. Compliance officers can see exactly which signals contributed — sanctions presence, jurisdiction risk, network proximity — and trace each to its authoritative source. No black boxes.

CRITICAL75-100HIGH50-74MEDIUM25-49LOW0-24Mossack Fonseca94/100Huawei Tech.87/100Kaspersky Lab65/100Acme Corp.12/100ENTITIES CLASSIFIED BY PRISM COMPOSITE SCORE

[ TIER CLASSIFICATION ]

Automatic risk tier assignment for operational workflows.

Entities are classified into CRITICAL (75-100), HIGH (50-74), MEDIUM (25-49), and LOW (0-24) tiers. Tier thresholds are configurable. Tier changes trigger real-time alerts and can drive automated escalation, hold, or release workflows.

PRISM WEIGHT CONFIGURATIONSANCTIONS80PEP STATUS50DEBARMENTS35JURISDICTION30NETWORK RISK30OFFSHORE LEAKS20SHELL INDICATORS20HISTORICAL15MAX COMPOSITE: 280 · NORMALIZED TO 0-100 SCALE · CAPPED AT 100

[ CONFIGURABLE WEIGHTS ]

Tune PRISM to your institution's specific risk posture.

Different institutions have different risk appetites. A defense contractor may weight jurisdiction risk higher than a retail bank. PRISM supports per-deployment weight configuration, with guardrails to prevent miscalibration and ensure regulatory compliance.